To analyse a football team beyond possession and shots, build a framework combining chance creation (xG, xThreat), ball progression, pressing and defensive stability, all adjusted for context. Use event data, clear definitions and simple visualisations. Start narrow (one competition, one season), validate each metric, then scale to club-wide usage.
Essential Metrics Summary for Match Analysis
- Track chance quality with métricas avançadas futebol expected goals xg (xG, xG on target, xG chain).
- Measure ball progression via expected threat (xT), field tilt and deep completions.
- Quantify pressing with PPDA, high regains and counterpressing recoveries.
- Evaluate defensive stability through box entries, shots conceded xG and transition defence.
- Contextualise everything by game state, opponent strength and home/away effects.
- Use ferramentas de análise de dados para clubes de futebol to automate, visualise and share insights safely.
Selecting Robust Performance Indicators Beyond Possession
Goal: Define a compact metric set that captures attack, defence and transitions better than raw possession or shots.
Good for: Analysts and coaches doing análise estatística de desempenho de times de futebol in professional or semi‑pro environments with event data access.
Not ideal when: You only have basic box‑score stats, extremely small samples (few games), or no stable tactical principles at the club.
Preparation checklist
- Clarify 3-5 key game model principles (e.g. high press, wing overloads, fast counters).
- Decide the main question: como analisar desempenho de time além da posse de bola for your context.
- List decisions metrics should support (selection, recruitment, training focus).
- Confirm you have consistent event data for at least one full competition.
| Metric | Basic calculation idea | Main interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Expected Goals (xG) | Sum chance probabilities for each shot based on location, type, body part, assist type. | Quality of chances created or conceded, independent of finishing luck. |
| Expected Threat (xT) | Assign value to ball locations; add changes in value after each action. | How much a team moves the ball into dangerous zones, even without shooting. |
| Field Tilt | Attacking-third passes for team ÷ (team + opponent) in open play. | Share of territorial dominance in advanced areas. |
| PPDA (Press Intensity) | Opposition passes allowed in your half ÷ your defensive actions in that zone. | Lower values = more intense high pressing. |
| High Turnovers | Ball recoveries in final third or just inside opponent half per match. | Effectiveness of press and counterpress in advanced areas. |
Start with 2-3 attacking and 2-3 defensive metrics tightly linked to your game model, then expand as data literacy grows.
Event-Based Data: Assembling and Cleaning Play-by-Play Records
Goal: Build a reliable event database (passes, shots, duels, pressures) for repeatable analysis.
Data and tools needed:
- Event data provider, or in‑house tagging via video and spreadsheets.
- Spreadsheet or database (Excel, Google Sheets, SQL) and a scripting language (Python or R).
- Basic software de análise de desempenho tático e estatístico no futebol (e.g. video tagging + exportable events).
Core steps
- Standardise event structure
Use consistent columns: match ID, minute, second, team, player, event type, x/y pitch coordinates, outcome, related event (e.g. shot ID for key passes). - Normalise pitch coordinates
Convert all provider formats to a standard 0-100 scale in both axes; unify attacking direction so that your team always attacks from left to right in the dataset. - Clean missing and impossible values
Remove or flag events with missing team, location far outside pitch, or timestamps out of match range. Correct obvious input errors only when video confirms the fix. - Merge with match context
Join event data with tables containing scoreline, game state (leading, drawing, trailing), home/away, opponent rating and formation, so every event can be analysed in context. - Version and back up
Keep raw and processed datasets separately, with clear version names by season and competition, and back them up to secure cloud or club servers.
Once your event data is stable, métricas avançadas futebol expected goals xg, xT and pressing indicators can be computed reliably and re-used every matchday.
Estimating Expected Threat, xG Chains and Build-Up Value
Goal: Quantify how sequences, not just shots, create danger and reflect your attacking game model.
Preparation checklist
- Have cleaned event data with passes, carries, shots and ball losses.
- Choose a grid resolution (e.g. 12×8 cells) for pitch zones.
- Decide whether to analyse only open play or include set‑pieces.
- Ensure you can link events into possessions or sequences.
-
Build an xT model from historical data
Estimate the probability that a possession will lead to a shot or goal from each grid cell, using past matches.- Count how often actions from a cell are followed by shots/goals within a short window.
- Spread value backwards so passes and carries that move the ball forward gain positive xT.
-
Assign xT to passes and carries
For each on‑ball action, compute xT gained = xT(end location) − xT(start location).- Positive values: progressive actions that increase threat.
- Negative values: backwards/safe actions that reduce immediate threat but may stabilise possession.
-
Compute xG and xG chain for shots
Use your xG model to assign a probability to each shot, then link previous actions in the same possession.- xG: quality of the final chance.
- xG chain: distribute that xG among all contributing passes, carries and dribbles in the move.
-
Aggregate build-up value by player and zone
Sum xT gained and xG chain contributions for players and pitch zones across matches.- Identify primary progressors (full-backs, pivots) and final third creators.
- See which zones your team uses most effectively to attack.
-
Transform into coaching outputs
Present concise reports and clips aligned with staff needs.- Heatmaps of xT gained and conceded by zone.
- Top 10 sequences illustrating ideal build-up versus problematic patterns.
Quantifying Defensive Actions, Pressing and Transition Outcomes
Goal: Verify that your defensive and pressing principles are executed, beyond counting tackles or clearances.
Review checklist for defensive and pressing metrics
- PPDA trends match the intended pressing height across recent matches.
- Number and location of high recoveries reflect trigger zones defined by staff.
- Time between ball loss and recovery in counterpress situations is decreasing or within target.
- Share of opponent passes completed into your defensive third remains within the staff benchmark.
- Box entries conceded (passes or carries into box) correlate with xG conceded, not just shots count.
- Transition goals conceded are tagged and linked to specific structural issues (e.g. full-backs too high).
- Pressure events near your box do not explode when leading late in matches (game management).
- Individual defensive contribution (interceptions, pressures leading to regains) is consistent with player role.
- Video clips confirm that «good» metrics are not hiding passive defending or late pressure.
Adjusting Metrics for Opponent Strength, Venue and Game State
Goal: Avoid overreacting to raw numbers that are mostly driven by context and opponent quality.
Frequent mistakes to avoid
- Comparing raw xG or xT per match without adjusting for whether you played top or bottom teams in the league.
- Ignoring home/away effects when evaluating field tilt or pressing intensity over a short run of games.
- Mixing minutes spent leading and trailing; performance usually changes strongly with game state but goes unaccounted.
- Using per‑match averages instead of per‑possession or per‑100 actions, which better handle tempo differences.
- Comparing players across positions without role‑specific baselines (e.g. centre‑backs vs full‑backs on progression metrics).
- Overfitting models on a single season for recruitment decisions, especially with small sample players.
- Assuming that improvements in a metric automatically mean better results, without testing correlation to points won.
- Copying benchmark values from other leagues or countries instead of building competition‑specific ranges.
- Overloading staff with indexes and composite scores that are not transparent in how they are calculated.
Practical Visualizations and Statistical Tests for Decision-Making
Goal: Turn complex metrics into safe, understandable outputs that help coaches and directors quickly.
Alternative approaches when full modelling is not feasible
- Simplified zonal counts and rates
Instead of full xT models, count passes into predefined danger zones and normalise per possession. This requires only basic spreadsheets and is suitable when coding resources are limited. - Rolling averages and control charts
Track 5-10 match rolling averages of key metrics (xG difference, field tilt, PPDA). Add simple control limits to identify genuine changes rather than random noise. - Non‑parametric comparisons
Use simple tests (e.g. Mann-Whitney) or resampling to compare performance before and after tactical changes. This is robust and understandable for staff when explained with visuals. - Template dashboards in off‑the‑shelf tools
Leverage general BI tools as ferramentas de análise de dados para clubes de futebol instead of building custom software. Predefined dashboards keep processes safe, transparent and easier to maintain.
Common Clarifications and Practical Pitfalls
How many matches do I need before trusting advanced metrics?
Look at trends rather than single matches. For team metrics, a block of several matches in the same competition and tactical context is usually the minimum to draw cautious conclusions. For players, combine club data with longer‑term information when possible.
Can I do useful analysis without coding skills?
Yes. Start with structured exports from your software de análise de desempenho tático e estatístico no futebol and work in spreadsheets. You can calculate basic xG, field tilt and pressing counts safely, then later collaborate with someone who codes to extend the model.
Is xG enough to describe attacking performance?
No. xG focuses on final chances. To understand how you arrive there, you need xT, xG chains and build‑up value metrics that link progression and creation phases. Combining them with video is essential for coaching decisions.
How do I align metrics with the coach’s game model?
Translate key principles into measurable events: where to recover the ball, preferred attack corridors, acceptable risk in build‑up. Design 1-2 metrics per principle and review them with staff regularly, adjusting definitions when the model evolves.
What if event data from my provider has errors?
Expect some noise and build checks: extreme coordinates, impossible timestamps, missing teams or players. Correct only when video confirms the reality, and keep raw data unchanged in a separate archive to avoid irreversible mistakes.
How can smaller clubs start with limited budget?
Begin with manual tagging of a few key events and simple spreadsheets focusing on como analisar desempenho de time além da posse de bola and basic xG. As capacity grows, invest in affordable ferramentas de análise de dados para clubes de futebol and add more detailed tagging and modelling.
Should I compare my team to top European clubs?
Comparison can inspire ideas, but benchmarks must be competition‑specific. Differences in tempo, style and quality make direct comparisons misleading. Build your own baselines for análise estatística de desempenho de times de futebol within your league first.